原始文献 / 论坛帖 / Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin
Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin
Bitcointalk · 2010-06-16 00:15:47 UTC
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345
或
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=<bitcoinaddress><separatorchar>1.2.3.4&amount=200.00
但既然链接已经替你把字打了，我看不出用域名地址比用比特币地址有什么好处。用比特币地址，用户打不出匿名付款。不拿到正确的比特币地址，他们就付不出去。
按域名发送的好处是能直观核实钱去向谁。
更关键的问题是：如果浏览器不允许连 127.0.0.1 怎么办：
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589
如果真是这样，那个例子里带 127.0.0.1 的 freenet 链接又怎么说？
英文原文
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345
or
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=<bitcoinaddress><separatorchar>1.2.3.4&amount=200.00
But as long as the link is already doing the typing for you, I don't see much benefit in using a domain address instead of bitcoin address. With a bitcoin address, the user can't send an unidentified payment. They can't send payment until they've been given a correct bitcoin address to send to.
What would be nice about sending by domain is you could visually verify who it's going to.
A more crucial issue is what if the browser isn't allowed to connect to 127.0.0.1:
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589
and if that's true, then what about that example freenet link that had 127.0.0.1 in it?