原始文献 / 论坛帖 / Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0
Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0
Bitcointalk · 2010-07-05 21:31:14 UTC
顺便说一句，在经历了那场短暂的 1.3 折腾之后我恢复了理智，这次发布仍然是 0.3 beta，不是 1.0。
我非常感谢大家的努力，但里面有很多问题。
我们不想把 "anonymous" 放在最前面。（我一直想改首页）
"开发者预计这将产生一种相对于能源稳定的、不受任何政府控制的货币。"——我绝对不会做这样的挑衅式断言。
它不是相对于能源稳定的。之前有过讨论。它并不与能源成本挂钩。NLS 基于能源的估算是很好的估算起点，但市场力量将越来越多地主导价格。
抱歉要泼冷水。给这个东西写面向大众的描述实在太难了，找不到任何可以类比的东西。
英文原文
BTW, I did come to my senses after that brief bout with 1.3, this release is still going to be 0.3 beta not 1.0.
I really appreciate the effort, but there are a lot of problems.
We don't want to lead with "anonymous". (I've been meaning to edit the homepage)
"The developers expect that this will result in a stable-with-respect-to-energy currency outside the reach of any government." -- I am definitely not making an such taunt or assertion.
It's not stable-with-respect-to-energy. There was a discussion on this. It's not tied to the cost of energy. NLS's estimate based on energy was a good estimated starting point, but market forces will increasingly dominate.
Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard. There's nothing to relate it to.