原始文献 / 论坛帖 / Re: Flood attack 0.00000001 BC
Re: Flood attack 0.00000001 BC
Bitcointalk · 2010-08-04 16:25:36 UTC
【引用 Insti 于 2010年8月4日 14:58:31（https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7498#msg7498）】
"它似乎弊大于利，因为它阻碍了微支付的实现，比如 bytemaster 提议的那种。"
比特币目前对非常小的微支付并不实用。比如按次搜索付费或按页面浏览付费，如果没有聚合机制就不行；需要支付少于 0.01 的也不行。粉尘垃圾交易限制是第一次有意尝试阻止这类过小的微支付。
比特币适用于比现有支付方式所能处理的更小的交易。小到可以覆盖你所说的微支付区间的高端。但它并不声称对任意小的微支付都实用。
英文原文
【引用 Insti on August 04, 2010, 02:58:31 PM（https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7498#msg7498）】
"It seems to do more harm than good because it prevents micropayment implementations such as the one bytemaster is suggesting."
Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments. Not for things like pay per search or per page view without an aggregating mechanism, not things needing to pay less than 0.01. The dust spam limit is a first try at intentionally trying to prevent overly small micropayments like that.
Bitcoin is practical for smaller transactions than are practical with existing payment methods. Small enough to include what you might call the top of the micropayment range. But it doesn't claim to be practical for arbitrarily small micropayments.