原始文献 / 论坛帖 / Re: Gentoo Linux Ebuild
Re: Gentoo Linux Ebuild
Bitcointalk · 2010-08-27 00:49:43 UTC
试试 -datadir=
上次我试 $(shell /usr/bin/wx-config) 时，立刻就有人嚷嚷说用它构建有问题。当时没时间细查。
$(shell /usr/bin/wx-config) 的一个问题是，它会随便抓到当时存在的任意版本（wx 2.8）和任意配置（非 UTF-8）的 wxWidgets。-lwx_gtk2ud-2.9 只匹配正确的配置。如果 wxWidgets 用了错误的配置构建，它就会失败。
引用
Iirc，我在 freenode 的 #wxwidgets 频道跟开发者们聊过，他们对为什么用这个感到不解。
他们说了为什么觉得不可思议吗？
引用
这是因为在我的系统上路径是 /usr/include/wx-2.9/wx/wx.h
它为什么在那？是操作系统自带的，还是你自己构建的？如果你是自己构建的，我很好奇它为什么会把自己放到别处。
wxWidgets 2.9 终于有 debian 包了吗？
也许我们应该这样：
INCLUDEPATHS= \
-I"/usr/local/include/wx-2.9" \
-I"/usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" \
-I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" \
-I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9"
同样，这些路径能确保只用 2.9，遇到 2.8 会失败。
wxWidgets 2.8 有 ANSI 和 UTF-16 两种，都不合我们用。它诱人是因为很容易装到包；很多人被它折腾得够呛，直到我们开始在 makefile 里硬编码 2.9。
英文原文
Try -datadir=
Last time I tried $(shell /usr/bin/wx-config), there was immediate hollering about build problems with it. There wasn't time to investigate at the time.
One problem with $(shell /usr/bin/wx-config) is it will pick up any version (wx 2.8 ) and any configuration (non-UTF-8 ) of wxWidgets that happens to be there. -lwx_gtk2ud-2.9 only matches the right configuration. It fails if wxWidgets was built with the wrong configuration.
Quote
Iirc, chatting in #wxwidgets on freenode, the devs there were baffled why that was used.
Did they say why they were baffled?
Quote
This is because on my system the path is /usr/include/wx-2.9/wx/wx.h
Why is it there? Was it included by the OS, or did you have to build it? If you built it, I wonder why it would put itself in a different place.
Has wxWidgets 2.9 finally started to become available as a debian package?
Maybe we should do this:
INCLUDEPATHS= \
-I"/usr/local/include/wx-2.9" \
-I"/usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" \
-I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" \
-I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9"
Again, those paths help make sure it's only 2.9 and will fail with 2.8.
wxWidgets 2.8 comes in ANSI and UTF-16, both wrong for us. It's tempting because it's so easily available as a package; a lot of people were frustrated by it until we started hardcoding 2.9 into the makefile.