原始文献 / 论坛帖 / Re: BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin
Re: BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin
Bitcointalk · 2010-12-11 13:08:30 UTC
@dtvan：3 个点都很到位。
1）IP 记录不需要进链，只做注册商功能、不做 DNS。CA 问题也顺带解决了，漂亮。
2）选一个顶级域，.web +1。
3）过期和可观的续费成本，非常重要。
引用自 joe（2010 年 12 月 11 日 10:53:58 AM）（https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg29130#msg29130）：不过现在再想想，我支持在主网里纳入额外的 coinbase/跟踪系统。理由是不要把 CPU 算力稀释到多个网络。我们想要一个强大的网络，所以网络应该多才多艺。
避免 CPU 算力碎片化已经不再是理由。独立网络/链可以共享 CPU 算力，而几乎不共享其他东西。见：http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696 和 http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715
英文原文
@dtvan: all 3 excellent points.
1) IP records don't need to be in the chain, just do registrar function not DNS. And CA problem solved, neat.
2) Pick one TLD, .web +1.
3) Expiration and significant renewal costs, very important.
Quote from: joe on December 11, 2010, 10:53:58 AM（https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg29130#msg29130）However, thinking more about this now I support inclusion of additional coinbases / tracking systems in the main network. The reason for doing this is so as not to water down CPU power into multiple networks. We want one strong network, so the network should be versatile.
Avoiding CPU power fragmentation is no longer a reason. Independent networks/chains can share CPU power without sharing much else. See: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696 and http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715